The Court of Appeal has overturned a controversial lower court ruling that sought to seize Rivers State's revenue. This decision, welcomed by the opposition, affirms the principle of state autonomy and deals a blow to those attempting to undermine the judiciary.
On December 13, 2024, Justice Hamma Akawu Barka ruled that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to intervene in matters concerning state revenue. The Appeal Court upheld the arguments of Rivers State's legal team, led by Chief Chris Uche, SAN, emphasizing that such disputes fall under the purview of state courts.
The ruling sparked jubilation across Rivers State, with residents celebrating on the streets. Opposition groups, including HURIWA, Joint Action for Democracy, and Lawyers in Defence of Democracy, hailed the decision as a crucial step towards preserving federalism and upholding constitutional democracy.
Hon. Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere, spokesperson for the Opposition Lawmakers Coalition, praised the judgment, stating that it protected the state's integrity and the nation's democratic framework. He condemned the actions of the pro-Wike faction, accusing them of attempting to exploit the courts for political gain.
Ugochinyere highlighted the ongoing legal battle regarding the state's House of Assembly, where illegal defections have created political instability. He emphasized that the Supreme Court has recognized the current 4-member assembly and that any attempt to disrupt its functions is illegal.
The Appeal Court's decision, Ugochinyere asserted, reaffirmed the principle of separation of powers and prevented further chaos within the state. He criticized the pro-Wike group for their "petty malice" and their attempts to use the courts for personal agendas.
0 Comments